Capital Research Center writer Rondi Adamson (her blog may be found here), a Canadian, warns against Canadians’ tendency to defend their universal Medicare system in moralistic terms.

There are, de facto, death panels. Alarmist terminology aside, in a single-payer, public system, the state will decide how to mete out finite resources. Of course, with private healthcare there are also “death panels.” But at least you can shop around for an insurer who will be generously inclined towards your various ailments.

Had the doctors overseeing my mother’s case decided against surgery, her only option would have been to go to the United States, something she could not have afforded. But they decided in her favour and what came next demonstrated one of the best things about our system. Due to luck of the draw and the hospital to which her cardiologist was linked — as opposed to wealth or influential friends — my mother had her surgery performed by one of the best heart doctors in the country.

I tell this story in response not so much to the ongoing debate about healthcare in the United States, but in response to the general Canadian sanctimony about it. We would do well to not preach, in spite of Barack Obama ’s assertion — during his appearance a few weeks ago on the Late Show with David Letterman — that Canadians “are perfectly happy with their system.”  

(hat tip: Doug Bandow, AmSpecBlog)

This entry was posted on Saturday, November 28th, 2009 at 12:35 am and is filed under AmSpecBlog, American Spectator, Doug Bandow, Rondi Adamson. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.